Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The way in which individualised acts of attention-seeking by celebrities become entertaining scripts of subjectivity for a population that is increasingly aware of an overall decline in well-being offers a lens into the ways in which excessive celebrity selves and their philanthropic temperance have become ascetic cues directed at the stability of a global governing regime. In this essay I argue that modern-day parables of philanthropic celebrities powerfully govern the oppositional impulse as they impart as sense of ‘benevolence’ in the form of an individualised disposition towards well-being and entitlement. I begin by considering how celebrated parables are continuous with previous governing practices aimed at the management of sense of well-being. I then observe the role of contemporary neoliberal parables of philanthromentality in the construction of a new asceticism of global capitalism, to which celebrities contribute. I conclude that these parables represent technologies of governing that operate through the celebration of a philanthropic ascetic that facilitates the continued suppression of imagination about alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricia Mooney Nickel (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: