Why the study?
Hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion rates are low, leading to the development and feasibility assessment of a 6-week home-based cardiac rehabilitation alternative.
Is a 6-week home-based cardiac rehabilitation program feasible and safe for patients with left ventricular dysfunction or a history of MI?
Is a 6-week home-based cardiac rehabilitation program feasible and safe for patients with left ventricular dysfunction or a history of MI?
A 6-week home-based cardiac rehabilitation program is safe, feasible, and effective in increasing physical activity levels in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Home-based CR appears feasible in LV dysfunction or post-MI patients; larger trials needed before practice change.
Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for patients with cardiovascular disease. However, the participation and completion rates for hospital-based CR are low, and home-based CR has been suggested as an alternative. This study aimed to develop a home-based CR program and assess its feasibility over a 6-week period in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or a history of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods The study consisted of two parts: Pilot Study 1 focused on developing an exercise protocol, while Study 2 aimed to assess the feasibility of a 6-week home-based CR program. Eight patients participated in Study 1 and 16 participated in Study 2. The home-based CR exercise program in Study 2 was developed based on the results of Study 1 and included two exercise education sessions and four telephone counseling sessions. Results Participants expressed overall satisfaction with the exercise program in Study 1. Heart rate increased in response to exercise, but this did not correspond with perceived exertion. In Study 2, 13 out of 16 participants (81.3%) completed the 6-week home-based CR program, with a participation rate of 100% in both exercise education and phone counseling sessions. Adherence to the exercise protocol was 83.1% and no serious adverse events were observed. At the beginning of the study, only three out of 13 participants (23.1%) met the requirements for both aerobic and resistance exercises, but at the end of the 6-week program, 10 out of 13 participants (76.9%) fulfilled the requirements. Conclusion The exercise program developed in this study was safe and feasible, and the 6-week home-based CR program was feasible and effective in increasing the physical activity levels of patients with left ventricular dysfunction without any reported adverse effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: