Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We explored the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) using 3 samples totaling 2,066 Mainland Chinese undergraduates. All participants completed the ISI and Sample 2 completed 3 other related measures. Their responses were processed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multiple group analyses. The EFA results revealed a 2-factor structure, whereas the CFA results supported a 3-factor solution, the latter of which was further confirmed by the results of multiple group analyses. The Chinese version of the ISI had a satisfactory Cronbach's alpha coefficient of internal reliability, 2-week test–retest reliability, and criterion validity. Overall, we found that the ISI is a reliable, valid, and psychometrically sound measure of insomnia for use with Mainland Chinese undergraduates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: