RNA viruses have evolved diverse mechanisms, such as replicase fidelity and recombination, to protect their genome integrity and termini from corruption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform antiviral strategies targeting RNA virus genome protection; leaves open clinical translation pending targeted trials.
RNA genomes are vulnerable to corruption by a range of activities, including inaccurate replication by the error-prone replicase, damage from environmental factors, and attack by nucleases and other RNA-modifying enzymes that comprise the cellular intrinsic or innate immune response. Damage to coding regions and loss of critical cis-acting signals inevitably impair genome fitness; as a consequence, RNA viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to protect their genome integrity. These include mechanisms to promote replicase fidelity, recombination activities that allow exchange of sequences between different RNA templates, and mechanisms to repair the genome termini. In this article, we review examples of these processes from a range of RNA viruses to showcase the diverse approaches that viruses have evolved to maintain their genome sequence integrity, focusing first on mechanisms that viruses use to protect their entire genome, and then concentrating on mechanisms that allow protection of the genome termini, which are especially vulnerable. In addition, we discuss examples in which it might be beneficial for a virus to 'lose' its genomic termini and reduce its replication efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barr et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: