Why the study?
Few studies comprehensively illustrate the associations of lifestyle and environmental factors with general, physical, mental, and social suboptimal health status.
Are lifestyle behaviors and environment factors associated with suboptimal health status in urban residents?
Are lifestyle behaviors and environment factors associated with suboptimal health status in urban residents?
Lifestyle behaviors and environmental factors are significantly associated with suboptimal health status, with lifestyle impacting physical health more and environment impacting mental health more.
Lifestyle and environmental factors may influence SHS prevalence; leaves open causal directions requiring prospective confirmation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal health status (SHS), an intermediate state between chronic disease and health, is characterized by chronic fatigue, non-specific pain, headaches, dizziness, anxiety, depression, and functional system disorders with a high prevalence worldwide. Although some lifestyle factors (e.g. smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise) and environmental factors (e.g. air quality, noise, living conditions) have already been studied, few studies can comprehensively illustrate the associations of lifestyle and environment factors with general, physical, mental, and social SHS. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 6750 urban residents aged 14 years or over in five random cities from September 2017 to September 2018 through face-to-face questionnaires. There were 5881 valid questionnaires with a response rate of 87%. A general linear model and structural equation model were developed to quantify the effects of lifestyle behaviors and environment factors on SHS. RESULTS: The detection rates of general, physical, mental, and social SHS were 66.7, 67.0, 65.5, and 70.0%, respectively. Good lifestyle behaviors and favorable environment factors positively affected SHS (P < 0.001). Lifestyle behaviors had the largest effect on physical SHS (β = - 0.418), but the least on social SHS (β = - 0.274). Environment factors had the largest effect on mental SHS (β = 0.286), but the least on physical SHS (β = 0.225). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle behaviors and environment factors were important influencing factors of SHS. Physical SHS was more associated with lifestyle. Lifestyle and environment were similarly associated with mental and social SHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: