Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The application of morphological rules by 10 high-risk and 10 normal children and 12 learning disabled and 12 achieving children were compared. An adaptation of Berko's experimental test of morphology was administered. High-risk and learning disabled children gave significantly fewer correct responses than their controls. For high-risk children, the greatest relative performance differences were for third person singular, progressive, past tense, and adjectival inflections. For learning-disabled children, the greatest relative differences were for third person singular, possessives, and adjectival inflections. It was concluded that high-risk and learning disabled children exhibited differential and qualitatively similar delays in the acquisition of morphological rules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiig et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: