Why the study?
VA-ECMO provides hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI, but long-term outcomes have not previously been studied.
Does venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support improve long-term survival in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions?
Does venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support improve long-term survival in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions?
VA-ECMO provides feasible hemodynamic support for high-risk PCI, yielding a 93.4% procedural success rate and 45.9% overall long-term survival.
First long-term VA-ECMO-supported high-risk PCI data; leaves open optimal selection and comparative effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) offers hemodynamic support for patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, long-term outcomes associated with VA-ECMO have not previously been studied. AIM: To explore long-term outcomes in high-risk cases undergoing PCI supported by VA-ECMO. METHODS: In the present observational cohort study, 61 patients who received VA-ECMO-supported high-risk PCI between April 2012 and January 2020 at the Sixth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital were enrolled. The endpoint characteristics such as all-cause mortality, repeated cardiovascular diseases, and cardiac death were examined. RESULTS: Among 61 patients, three failed stent implantation due to chronic total occlusions with severely calcified lesions. One patient showed VA-ECMO intolerance because of high left ventricular afterload. PCI was successfully performed in 57 patients (93.4%). The in-hospital mortality was 23.0%, and the overall survival was 45.9%, with a median follow-up period of 38.6 (8.6-62.1) mo. CONCLUSION: VA-ECMO can be used as a support in patients undergoing high-risk PCI as it is associated with favorable long-term patient survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: