Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this report, a facile wet chemical method using acetonitrile combined with thermal annealing was used to prepare Li 2 S‐P 2 S 5 (LPS) based glass‐ceramic electrolytes with (1 wt%, 3 wt%, and 5 wt% Ce 2 S 3 ) and without Ce 2 S 3 doping. The crystal structure, ionic conductivity, and chemical stability of Li 7 P 3 S 11 glass‐ceramic electrolytes were examined at varying temperatures (250–350°C). The results indicated that the highest ionic conductivity of 3.15 × 10 −4 S cm −1 for pure Li 7 P 3 S 11 was observed at a temperature of 325°C. By incorporating 1 wt% Ce 2 S 3 and subjecting it to a heat treatment at 250°C, the glass ceramic electrolyte attained a remarkable ionic conductivity of 7.7 × 10 −4 (S cm −1 ) at 25°C. Furthermore, it exhibited a stable and extensive electrochemical potential range, reaching up to 5 volts when compared to the Li/Li + reference electrode. By tuning the glass transition and crystallization temperature, cerium doping seems to make Li 7 P 3 S 11 more chemically stable, compared to its original 70Li 2 S‐30P 2 S 5 counterpart. According to Raman and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses, cerium doping inhibits the decomposition of highly conductive P 2 S 7 4‐ (pyro‐thiophosphate) to PS 4 3− and P 2 S 6 4− . Doped LPS has a greater crystallinity and more uniform microstructure than pure LPS, according to XRD, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Consequently, Li 7 P 2.9 Ce 0.1 S 11 electrolyte shows great potential as a solid‐state electrolyte for constructing high‐performance sulfide‐based all‐solid‐state batteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirtaleb et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: