SUMMARY To evaluate the effects of a modern cultivation system of plastic film mulching with drip irrigation (MD) on soil greenhouse gas fluxes, methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes were quantified and contrasted in an MD system and a traditional system of mulch-free flood-irrigated (MFF) cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) in fields of northwest China. The results showed that soil N 2 O flux and the absorption rate of CH 4 were lower in the MD than the MFF sites. A possible reason for the higher CH 4 emissions at MD sites was that the relatively low gaseous oxygen (O 2 ) availability and high ammonium (NH 4 + ) content in the MD soil increased CH 4 generation by methanogens and decreased CH 4 oxidation by methanotrophs. The lower N 2 O in the MD sites may be due to an increase of soil denitrification by Thiobacillus denitrificans that reduced some nitrous compounds further into nitrogen gas (N 2 ). Taking into account the global warming potentials of CH 4 and N 2 O in a 100-year time horizon, during the entire growth period, the contribution of CH 4 to the greenhouse effect was significantly lower than N 2 O in these two treatments. Considering these two greenhouse gas fluxes together, a transition from non-mulching cultivation to mulching cultivation could reduce atmospheric emissions by c . 20 g CO 2 e m 2 /season. Based on these findings and previous studies, it can be concluded that mulched-drip irrigation cultivation is a good way to decrease the emission of greenhouse gases and reduce the global warming impact of arid farmlands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: