Even though image plate technology is successfully applied in x-ray detection, many questions concerning its detailed functional mechanisms have still not been answered. In this paper it will be shown that a previously suggested non-stoichiometric monophase of BaF 1.12 Br 0.88 : Eu 2+ resulting from the BaF 2 /NH 4 Br preparation route cannot be supported. It will be demonstrated by x-ray analysis that depending on the starting ratio of BaF 2 to NH 4 Br during sintering or the already synthesized BaFBr : Eu 2+ to BaF 2 during annealing, stoichiometric BaFBr : Eu 2+ with or without a BaF 2 phase will always be obtained. Furthermore, it will be shown that in the case of a molar stoichiometric starting ratio of BaF 2 /NH 4 Br, partial sublimation of NH 4 Br during sintering can be hold responsible for the appearance of BaF 2 as a second phase. Rietveld refinement is utilized to derive the quantitative amount of the individual phase compositions of BaFBr : Eu 2+ and BaF 2 . In terms of image plate properties, it will be shown that the composition of BaFBr : Eu 2+ and BaF 2 after the high temperature treatment determines the type of photostimulable colour centre generated during x-irradiation. Finally, the results obtained will be interpreted in terms of published photostimulated luminescence formation models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hesse et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: