The skill of a set of extended-range dynamical forecasts made with a modern numerical forecast model is examined. A forecast is said to be skillful if it produces a high quality forecast by correctly modeling some aspects of the dynamics of the real atmosphere; high quality forecasts may also occur by chance. The dangers of making a conclusion about model skill by verifying a single long-range forecast are pointed out by examples of apparently high “skill” verifications between extended-range forecasts and observed fields from entirely different years. To avoid these problems, the entire distribution of forecast quality for a large set of forecasts as a function of lead time is examined. A set of control forecasts that clearly have no skill is presented. The quality distribution for the extended-range forecasts is compared to the distributions of quality for the no-skill control forecast set. The extended-range forecast quality distributions are found to be essentially indistinguishable from those for the no-skill control at leads somewhat greater than 12 days. A search for individual forecasts with a “return of skill” at extended ranges is also made. Although it is possible to find individual forecasts that have a return of quality, a comparison to the no-skill controls demonstrates that these return of skill forecasts occur only as often as is expected by chance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (1994) studied this question.