Why the study?
The association between frailty and coronary plaque phenotype among older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome was unknown.
Does frailty associate with high-risk coronary plaque phenotypes in older patients with NSTEACS?
Does frailty associate with high-risk coronary plaque phenotypes in older patients with NSTEACS?
In older patients with NSTEACS, frailty is independently associated with high-risk coronary plaque morphology, including thin-cap fibroatheroma.
Frailty linked to vulnerable plaques in older NSTEACS; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation before clinical use.
AIMS: The association of frailty with coronary plaque phenotype among older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of frailty with coronary plaque phenotype among older patients with NSTEACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Older patients with NSTEACS who underwent invasive angiography were recruited. Frailty was measured using the Fried frailty score. Following angiography, patients underwent greyscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) imaging. Of the 90 patients, 26 (28.9%) were robust, 49 (54.4%) patients were pre-frail, and 15 (16.7%) were frail. Mean age was 80.9±3.8 years; 59 (65.6%) were male. Compared to robust patients, the pre-frail group had a significantly greater presence of high-risk lesions including VH thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA, p=0.011), minimum lumen area (MLA) ≤4 mm2 (p=0.016), TCFA+MLA ≤4 mm2 (p=0.005), TCFA+plaque burden (PB) ≥70% (p=0.005) and TCFA+PB ≥70%+MLA ≤4 mm2 (p=0.003). By age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis, frailty was found to be strongly and independently associated with the presence of TCFA (odds ratio [OR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.06-7.48, p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report the relationship between frailty phenotype and coronary plaque morphology among frail older NSTEACS patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01933581.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: