Why the study?
To investigate whether electronic spatio-temporal image correlation (e-STIC) volume acquisition improves the reproducibility of fetal ventricular deformation analyses compared with two-dimensional echocardiography.
Does e-STIC improve the reproducibility of left ventricular deformation analyses compared to 2D echocardiography in fetuses?
Does e-STIC improve the reproducibility of left ventricular deformation analyses compared to 2D echocardiography in fetuses?
e-STIC provides superior intra-rater reliability for left ventricular global strain and ejection fraction compared to 2D analysis in fetal echocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
eSTIC may improve fetal deformation analysis reproducibility; leaves open clinical utility pending validation.
BACKGROUND: Speckle tracking technology has been applied to assess ventricular deformation throughout the cardiac cycle. An electronic four dimensional probe that allows rapid acquisition of electronic spatio-temporal image correlation volumes (eSTIC) has been recently introduced. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate whether e-STIC acquisition improves deformation analyses reproducibility. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited fetuses between 20 and 40 weeks of gestation. We obtained a 2D video clip and an e-STIC volume of a four-chamber view. We focused on left ventricular global strain (LV-GS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-FE). Intraobserver, interobserver and intermethod agreement were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and illustrated by Bland-Altman plots. Systematic differences between measurements were assessed using a paired t-test. The inter-rater reliability of LV-GS was moderate-to-substantial for both e-STIC and 2D. The inter-rater reliability of LV-FE obtained via e-STIC was superior to that obtained via 2D analysis. The intra-rater reliability of LV-GS obtained with e-STIC was superior to that obtained with 2D analysis (ICC 0.857; 95% IC 0.761-0.917). The intra-rater reliability of LV-FE obtained via e-STIC was superior to that obtained via 2D analysis (ICC 0.647; IC 0.51-0.783). CONCLUSIONS: e-STIC seems to be a better technique than 2D analysis for intra-rater reliability of LV-GS. 4D acquisition might improve intrinsic limitations of speckle tracking echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodaro et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: