Key result
MRI-based MMID4 quantification correlates moderately with microsphere-measured myocardial blood flow in acute ischemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative and semiquantitative contrast-enhanced (CE) dynamic perfusion MRI techniques are established as noninvasive diagnostic means of assessing coronary artery disease. However, to date quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) has not reached the same acceptance as MBF quantification with nuclear techniques. To validate quantification of MBF at rest using the extracellular contrast agent (CA) Gd-DTPA, we performed an animal study in a pig model of acute myocardial ischemia. We quantified MBF from MRI data with a mathematical model (MMID4) of the underlying vasculature. These MBF results were subsequently compared with the results from fluorescent microspheres. The study showed a correlation of r = 0.66 between MBF estimates obtained with MRI and those obtained with fluorescent microspheres. The correlation for ischemic and nonischemic myocardium was r = 0.86 and r = 0.47, respectively. In conclusion, quantification of resting MBF using MMID4 is a valid method under conditions of acute myocardial ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitt et al. (2005) studied Acute myocardial ischemia. Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) using MMID4 from MRI data vs. Fluorescent microspheres was evaluated on Correlation of MBF estimates (r = 0.66). Myocardial blood flow quantification using MRI and the MMID4 model correlated with fluorescent microspheres in a pig model of acute ischemia (overall r = 0.66).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: