Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compared psychological distress between immigrants from high- and low-income countries living in Oslo, and investigated whether pre- or post-migration factors could explain any such differences in distress levels. A cross-sectional survey with self-administered questionnaires was conducted between 2000 and 2001 among 812 immigrants from high-income countries and 1434 immigrants from low-income countries living in Oslo. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL)-10 was used to measure psychological distress. The prevalence rates of psychological distress among immigrants from high- and low-income countries were 10.3% and 24.3%, respectively (P=0.001). Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of distress among the latter group was 2.38 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-3.29. The first adjustment (socio-demographic variables) hardly attenuated the difference reported (adjusted OR =2.25, 95% CI 1.58-3.21), the second adjustment (socio-demographic and pre-migration variables) reduced the difference (adjusted OR =1.86, 95% CI 1.28-2.69) while the last adjustment (socio-demographic and pre- and post-migration variables) attenuated the difference below the level of significance (adjusted OR =1.33, 95% CI 0.88-2.01). This means that both pre-migration and post-migration factors were associated with the higher level of distress among immigrants from low-income countries, the post-migration factors in the host country probably being the most important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thapa et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: