Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective, head‐to‐head, placebo‐controlled trial

Study Type – Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? A previous trial found greater efficacy with the maximum available dose of fesoterodine 8 mg compared with the maximum available dose of tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo for improving overactive bladder symptoms, and patient‐reported outcomes were demonstrated by a recent placebo‐controlled, head‐to‐head trial. The results of this trial, the largest to date to compare antimuscarinic efficacy, confirms the superior efficacy of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg for the treatment of OAB symptoms, and further emphasize the clinical advantage of the availability of an additional 8‐mg dose over single‐dose tolterodine ER 4 mg. OBJECTIVE • To show the superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release (ER) in a placebo‐controlled overactive bladder (OAB) trial with predefined treatment comparisons for both diary measures and patient‐reported outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS • In this 12‐week, double‐blind, double‐dummy trial, subjects reporting >1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode and ≥8 micturitions per 24 h at baseline were randomized to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week, 8 mg for 11 weeks), tolterodine ER 4 mg, or placebo. • Subjects completed 3‐day bladder diaries, the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and the Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12 and the OAB Questionnaire at baseline and week 12. RESULTS • A total of 2417 subjects were randomized. At week 12, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superiority over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo on UUI episodes (primary endpoint), micturitions, urgency and most other diary endpoints, and on the PPBC, UPS and all OAB Questionnaire scales and domains (all P < 0.05). • Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was seen as early as week 4 (3 weeks after escalation to fesoterodine 8 mg). At week 1, fesoterodine 4 mg was superior to placebo on most diary variables, the PPBC and the UPS (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 4% with fesoterodine, 13% and 3% with tolterodine ER, and 5% and 2% with placebo. • Discontinuation rates as a result of adverse events were 5%, 3% and 2% for fesoterodine, tolterodine ER and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS • In this randomized study, which is the largest to compare antimuscarinic efficacy performed to date, fesoterodine 8 mg was superior to tolterodine ER 4 mg for UUI episodes, micturitions and urgency episodes, as well as for self‐reported patient assessments of bladder‐related problems, urgency, symptom bother and health‐related quality of life. • The superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was observed as early as 3 weeks after escalation from fesoterodine 4 mg for most outcomes. These data may have important implications for the clinical management of OAB patients previously treated with tolterodine ER.