Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparison is made between traditional quantum chemical approaches to the electron correlation problem and the one taken in density functional theory (DFT). Well-known concepts of DFT, such as the exchange−correlation energy E xc = ∫ρ( r ) ε xc ( r ) d r and the exchange−correlation potential v xc ( r ) are related to electron correlation as described in terms of density matrices and the conditional amplitude (Fermi and Coulomb holes). The Kohn−Sham one-electron or orbital model of DFT is contrasted with Hartree−Fock, and the definitions of exchange and correlation in DFT are compared with the traditional ones. The exchange−correlation energy density ε xc ( r ) is decomposed into kinetic and electron−electron potential energy components, and a practical way of calculating these from accurate wave functions is discussed, which offers a route to systematic improvement. v xc ( r ) is likewise decomposed, and special features (bond midpoint peak, various types of step behavior) are identified and related to electronic correlation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baerends et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: