Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Informal family assistance is often a key factor in determining whether a person with a disability can live in a community setting. However, the practice of paying relatives as caregivers remains controversial. This article reports findings from the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) in Arkansas, in which consumers receive a cash allowance to purchase personal assistance services. In this comparison of consumers who hired family vs. non-family workers, consumers who hired relatives received more service and had equal or superior satisfaction and health outcomes, as compared to those who hired non-relatives. Findings are further clarified by drawing from worker focus group reports and program experience, and policy issues are specifically addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon‐Rusinowitz et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: