Why the study?
Literature on outcomes for patients receiving both andexanet alfa and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding is limited.
What are the safety outcomes of using andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC for the reversal of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding?
What are the safety outcomes of using andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC for the reversal of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding?
The concurrent use of andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC for FXa inhibitor reversal is associated with high rates of thromboembolism and in-hospital mortality, highlighting significant safety concerns.
May warrant caution with dual reversal agents; leaves open need for comparative safety data in FXa inhibitor bleeding.
PURPOSE: To manage factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated bleeding, andexanet alfa or 4-factor prothrombin concentrate (4F-PCC) has been used to restore hemostasis. However, literature on the outcomes for patients who received both andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC is limited. SUMMARY: We report a case series of 5 patients who received andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC for reversal of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. Patients were included in this case series if they received both andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC for reversal of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. They were followed to either discharge or death, and in-hospital complications related to concurrent use of andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC were documented. We report an incidence of thromboembolism of 40% (2 of 5 cases) and an in-hospital mortality rate of 60% (3 of 5 cases). Taking these cases together with those in the existing literature, we found a total of 23 reported cases of safety outcomes with andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC. The overall incidence of thromboembolism was 35% (8 of 23 cases). CONCLUSION: This case series adds to the limited literature describing the outcomes for patients receiving andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC. We encourage other institutions to report safety data on administering both agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: