Why the study?
Beyond cardiovascular regulation, baroreceptor afferents play polymodal roles, leading to the hypothesis that baroreceptor denervation affects lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation and hemodynamic collapse.
Does sino-aortic denervation worsen cardiovascular collapse and alter systemic inflammation during LPS-induced sepsis in conscious rats?
Does sino-aortic denervation worsen cardiovascular collapse and alter systemic inflammation during LPS-induced sepsis in conscious rats?
Sino-aortic afferents are crucial for alleviating LPS-induced cardiovascular collapse, but their modulation of systemic inflammation and hemodynamic collapse do not appear to be interconnected.
Baroreceptor denervation effects in rat sepsis model warrant clinical caution; leaves open mechanistic role in human SI-hemodynamic collapse.
Beyond the regulation of cardiovascular function, baroreceptor afferents play polymodal roles. We hypothesized that baroreceptor denervation affects lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation (SI) and hemodynamic collapse in conscious rats, and that these parameters are interconnected. We combine: a) hemodynamic and thermoregulatory recordings after LPS administration at a septic-like dose b) analysis of the cardiovascular complexity, c) evaluation of vascular function in mesenteric resistance vessels, and d) measurements of inflammatory cytokines (plasma and spleen). LPS-induced drop in blood pressure was higher in sino-aortic denervated (SAD) rats. LPS-induced hemodynamic collapse was associated with SAD-dependent autonomic disbalance. LPS-induced vascular dysfunction was not affected by SAD. Surprisingly, SAD blunted LPS-induced surges of plasma and spleen cytokines. These data indicate that sino-aortic afferents are key to alleviate LPS-induced cardiovascular collapse, affecting the autonomic cardiovascular control, without affecting resistance blood vessels. Moreover, baroreflex modulation of the LPS-induced SI and hemodynamic collapse seem not to be interconnected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amorim et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: