Why the study?
Perioperative complications are common in kidney transplantation, but the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in renal transplant remains poorly described.
Does a formal ERAS protocol reduce length of stay in adult renal transplant recipients?
Does a formal ERAS protocol reduce length of stay in adult renal transplant recipients?
Formal ERAS protocols do not significantly improve length of stay or complications in UK renal transplant recipients, likely because ERAS principles are already broadly adopted.
ERAS protocols may not reduce LOS in renal transplant recipients; leaves open whether formal implementation adds value beyond current practice.
Perioperative complications are common in kidney transplantation. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a well-established multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to improve patient outcomes, however, its efficacy in renal transplant remains poorly described. Participating centres included adult renal transplant recipients and 30-day follow-up data. The primary outcome was LOS. Multivariable hierarchical models compared cohorts. 213 patients were included in the study period. 18/23 UK kidney transplant centres were represented. Analysis of the perioperative care delivery demonstrated similar patterns irrespective of reported protocols, with a tendency towards ERAS-type care. Between cohorts, the incidence of complications were similar; formal ERAS 14.3%, ERAS informal 17.0%, no ERAS 12.6%; p = 0.64. Median LOS was also similar; formal ERAS 6.0 days (5.0-11.5), informal ERAS 7.0 days (5.0-10.5) vs. no ERAS 6.0 days (5.0-10.5); p = 0.75. Readmissions were comparable; p = 0.721. Multivariable models confirmed these findings and demonstrated frailer patients had longer LOS and more readmissions. Currently, most UK renal transplant centres deliver a form of peri-operative ERAS care, indicating broad adoption of ERAS principles. Consequently, a formal ERAS protocol is not associated with decreased complications, LOS or readmissions. Efforts to improve outcomes should focus on prehabilitation of at-risk groups on the waiting list.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: