Why the study?
Uptake of ERAS protocols has been slow in kidney transplantation and unified guidance specific to this high-risk cohort was lacking.
Do Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce length of hospital stay and improve postoperative outcomes in kidney transplantation recipients?
Systematic Review (n=1,225)
Do Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce length of hospital stay and improve postoperative outcomes in kidney transplantation recipients?
ERAS protocols in kidney transplantation surgery are safe and feasible, offering reduced length of hospital stay without increasing readmission rates.
First ERAS recommendations for kidney transplantation now available; extends perioperative optimization to a high-risk cohort previously lacking unified protocols.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are now widely practiced in major surgery, improving postsurgical outcomes. Uptake of these programmes have been slow in kidney transplantation due to challenges in evaluating their safety and efficacy in this high-risk cohort. To date, there are no unified guidance and protocols specific to ERAS in kidney transplantation surgery. This paper aims to summarise current evidence in the literature and develop ERAS protocol recommendations for kidney transplantation recipients. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Medline databases were screened for studies relevant to ERAS protocols in kidney transplantation, up to August 2021. A secondary search was repeated for each ERAS recommendation to explore the specific evidence base available for each section of the protocol. Randomised controlled trials, case-control and cohort studies were included. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence available and recommendations. RESULTS: We identified six eligible studies with a total of 1225 participants. All studies found a reduction in length of hospital stay without affecting readmission rates. The evidence behind specific pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative interventions included in current ERAS protocols are reviewed and discussed. CONCLUSION: Compared to other surgical specialties, the evidence base for ERAS in kidney transplantation remains lacking, with further room for research and development. However, significant improvements to patient outcomes are already possible with application of the currently available evidence. This has shown that ERAS in kidney transplantation surgery is safe and feasible, with improved postoperative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Kidney transplantation (n=1,225). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols was evaluated on Length of hospital stay and readmission rates. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in kidney transplantation reduced the length of hospital stay without affecting readmission rates across 1,225 participants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: