Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two Extremes in Tin Chemistry: A Non‐bonding Sn–Sn Distance of 285 pm and a 119 Sn‐NMR Shift δ = 3301 in Organome‐tallic Derivatives of Sn(0) The reaction of Na[{Cp'(CO) 2 Mn} 2 H] with SnCl 2 , which produces the inidene compound [Cp'(CO) 2 Mn {article}{amsmath}{empty}{document}C - C{document} Sn(Cl) {article}{amsmath}{empty}{document}C - C{document} Mn‐(CO) 2 Cp'] − under standard workup procedures, results in the formation of [{Cp'(CO) 2 MnSn} 2 {μ 2 ‐Mn(CO) 2 Cp'} 2 {μ 2 ‐Cl}] − ( 1 ) when quenched with unpolar solvents. While, formally, 1 contains tin in its oxidation state zero, it may be conceived as composed of an Sn 2− 2 entity, which is linearly end‐on coordinated to two Cp'(CO) 2 Mn 16‐electron species; in addition the tin centers are bridged by two μ 2 ‐Mn(CO) 2 Cp' moieties and a μ 2 ‐Cl function. The resulting connectivity Sn 2 {μ 2 ‐Mn(CO) 2 Cp'} 2 {μ 2 ‐Cl} thus corresponds to a [1.1.1]propellane scaffolding. While there is no obvious need for a tin‐tin bond in this propellane‐type cage, a short Sn–Sn contact of only 285 pm is observed. While the 119 Sn‐NMR signal of 1 could not be recorded, the peculiar bonding in this type of compounds is generally mirrored in their unconventional 119 Sn‐NMR shift whereever signals can be observed: it is found that [{Cp*(CO) 2 Mn} 3 (μ 3 ‐Sn)], which contains trigonally planar‐coordinated μ 3 ‐Sn as a naked ligand atom, has its 119 Sn‐NMR resonance at δ = 3301 well beyond the known range of 119 Sn‐NMR shifts. This finding is interpreted in terms of a relatively week Sn pπ ‐Mn dπ π bonding which leads to low‐energy unoccupied molecular orbitals as the prerequisit for a large paramagnetic contribution to the NMR shift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiemenz et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: