Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The article deals with issues such as the size of a purchasing group, the types of benefits aimed for, and the real beneficiaries of purchasing groups. Design/methodology/approach The observations are based on the literature, as well as on interviews, mostly with Canadian and US health‐care managers. Findings Although often associated with the public sector, purchasing groups are also an alternative considered more and more by managers of the private sector. A purchasing group increases volume consolidation, making it possible to have only one negotiation, in order to increase the purchasing group members' power vis‐à‐vis that of its suppliers. However, a purchasing group also constitutes an additional link in the supply chain and its objectives could go contrary to those of some of its members. This is why organisations considering joining a purchasing group should analyse this option strategically, in order to assess correctly the potential long‐term benefits. Originality/value This article suggests key questions and an analytical framework to help managers assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of joining a purchase group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nollet et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: