Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prior attempts to differentiate between voters and nonvoters have focused on a single election, the implicit assumption being that voting or not voting in a particular election is indicative of a more general proclivity. This paper tests the impact of a number of factors that have emerged in earlier studies as predictors ofvoting participation, but uses participation over a series of 10 elections as the criterion. The model tested here demonstrates greater explanatory power than those previously tested, and follow-up analysis strongly suggests that this explanatory power is a function of the multi-election measurement of participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sigelman et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: