Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The symmetrical carbonates 5-8 were prepared from ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoates with aryl-, 4-(arylethynyl)-phenyl-, arylethynyl- or arylbutadiynyl-substituents in the 3- and 5-positions, by reaction with triphosgene. The choice of base (pyridine, DMAP, NaH) had a strong influence on the conversion: For the synthesis of the carbonates 5 and 6, it was sufficient to use pyridine as the base. However, for the synthesis of the carbonates 7 and 8, NaH had to be used instead. Single-crystal X-ray structure analysis of these carbonates revealed that the substituents point towards the corners of a distorted tetrahedron with the carbonate group sitting in the middle of the tetrahedron and the two angular phenolic building blocks intersecting with an angle of 51-71 degrees. In solution at room temperature, all four substituents are magnetically equivalent as a consequence of conformational flexibility. The two enantiomeric conformers of carbonate 5a interconvert rapidly, probably via a perfect trans conformation with the plane of the Aralpha perpendicular to the carbonate plane. In the case of carbonates 6-8 this process is inhibited by unfavourable interaction of the long substituents at the benzoate moiety. The dynamic process, which has an energy barrier of 8-10 kcalmol(-1), is described in a simplified manner as a continuous rotation of the angular building blocks around the carbonate unit with the C(aryl)-O bonds as the axes of rotation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godt et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: