Why the study?
Does spiral acquisition reduce scan time of four-dimensional flow MRI without sacrificing quality compared to Cartesian acquisition?
Does spiral acquisition reduce scan time of four-dimensional flow MRI without sacrificing quality compared to Cartesian acquisition?
Spiral readouts can reduce 4D flow MRI scan times by 2-3 fold without compromising image quality or flow quantification, potentially improving clinical workflow integration.
May facilitate 4D flow MRI workflow integration; leaves open prospective validation in broader cohorts.
Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI is an important tool for physiological as well as clinical studies of blood flow in the heart and vessels. The application of the technique is, however, limited by the long scan times required. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of using spiral readouts to reduce the scan time of four-dimensional flow MRI without sacrificing quality. Three spiral approaches are presented and evaluated in vivo and in vitro against a conventional Cartesian acquisition. In vivo, the performance of each method was assessed in the thoracic aorta in 10 volunteers using pathline-based analysis and cardiac output analysis. Signal-to-noise ratio and background phase errors were investigated in vitro. Using spiral readouts, the scan times of a four-dimensional flow acquisition of the thoracic aorta could be reduced 2-3-fold, with no statistically significant difference in pathline validity or cardiac output. The shortened scan time improves the applicability of four-dimensional flow MRI, which may allow the technique to become a part of a clinical workflow for cardiovascular functional imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sigfridsson et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: