Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a crucially important, though not unique, vehicle for technology transfer in the context of transition. Analysis of actual patterns of FDI does, however, reveal a serious danger—that FDI may be asset absorbing (shallow integration) rather than asset creating (deep integration), i.e. may simply exploit existing factor endowments, including technological capabilities, rather than upgrading them. While abuse of market power does occur with FDI, it should not be seen as a critical problem as long as genuine asset creation is going on. At present there is a serious mismatch between the S&T systems of the transition countries and the needs of foreign firms carrying out FDI. It would be unrealistic to expect FDI to drive the process of resolution if these mismatch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David A. Dyker (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: