The objects of credence are the entities to which credences are assigned for the purposes of a successful theory of credence. I use cases akin to Frege's puzzle to argue against referentialism about credence: the view that objects of credence are determined by the objects and properties at which one's credence is directed. I go on to develop a non-referential account of the objects of credence in terms of sets of epistemically possible scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. J. Chalmers (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: