Why the study?
High catecholamine dosing requirements needed to achieve targeted hemodynamic goals in vasodilatory shock may increase the risk of vasopressor-induced adverse events.
Do catecholamine-sparing agents reduce vasoactive support requirements in critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock?
Do catecholamine-sparing agents reduce vasoactive support requirements in critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock?
This review highlights the potential role of various catecholamine-sparing agents in managing vasodilatory shock to mitigate the risks associated with high-dose catecholamine therapy.
Standard initiation of fluids and adrenergic vasopressors in vasodilatory shock; leaves open optimal sparing strategies for further study.
Shock syndromes are associated with unacceptably high rates of mortality in critically ill patients despite advances in therapeutic options. Vasodilatory shock is the most common type encountered in the intensive care unit. It is manifested by cardiovascular failure, peripheral vasodilatation, and arterial hypotension leading to tissue hypoperfusion and organ failure. Hemodynamic support is typically initiated with fluid resuscitation strategies and administration of adrenergic vasopressor agents in nonresponsive patients to restore arterial pressure with subsequent adequate organ reperfusion. Unfortunately, high catecholamine dosing requirements may be necessary to achieve targeted hemodynamic goals that may increase the risk of vasopressor-induced adverse events. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical efficacy and safety data and potential role in therapy for catecholamine-sparing agents in vasodilatory shock. Adjunctive therapeutic options to reduce vasoactive support requirements without compromising arterial pressure include arginine vasopressin and analogs, corticosteroids, midodrine, methylene blue, and angiotensin II. Although concomitant vasopressin and corticosteroids have a more defined role in evidence-based guidelines for managing shock, clinicians may consider other potential catecholamine-sparing agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckley et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: