Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical exploration of symplectic determinant laws, investigating pseudorepresentations, and outcomes in algebra involving involution.
We introduce the notion of symplectic determinant laws in analogy to Chenevier’s definition of determinant laws. Symplectic determinant laws are a way to define pseudorepresentations for symplectic representations of algebras with involution over arbitrary Z [ 1 2 ] Z[1/2] double struck upper Z left bracket one half right bracket -algebras. We prove that this notion satisfies the properties expected from a good theory of pseudorepresentations, and we compare it to V. Lafforgue’s Sp 2 d Sp2d upper S p Subscript 2 d -pseudocharacters. In the process, we compute generators of the invariant algebras A [ M 2 d m ] Sp 2 d A[M2dᵐ]^Sp2d upper A left bracket upper M Subscript 2 d Superscript m Baseline right bracket Superscript upper S p Super Subscript 2 d and A [ G m ] G A[Gᵐ]G upper A left bracket upper G Superscript m Baseline right bracket Superscript upper G when G ∈ { Sp 2 d , O d , GSp 2 d a n d GO d } G ∈ 2d, Od, GSp2d and\ GOd\ upper G element of StartSet upper S p Subscript 2 d Baseline comma normal upper O Subscript d Baseline comma upper G upper S p Subscript 2 d Baseline a n d upper G upper O Subscript d Baseline EndSet </jats:inline-form
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moakher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: