Evaluates antibacterial efficacy of TiO2 doped coatings on surfaces, suggesting effective antimicrobial applications.
Pristine TiO 2 , N-doped TiO 2 , Cu-modified TiO 2 prepared from chloride and sulphate precursors, and N-Cu co-modified TiO 2 were compared to determine how dopant type, precursor chemistry, and concentration influence physicochemical properties, methylene-blue decolorization, and antibacterial performance. The materials were characterized by SEM-EDS, XRD, XPS, FTIR, UV-DRS, and zeta-potential analysis and were evaluated as proof-of-concept paint coatings. SEM showed near-spherical primary particles of approximately 21 nm for pristine TiO 2 and 16 nm for N-TiO 2 , whereas the Cu-containing and co-modified materials were generally larger or more aggregated. XRD confirmed retention of predominantly anatase TiO 2 , while XPS identified N-containing states and precursor-dependent Cu surface chemistry: reduced and/or highly dispersed Cu species were favoured by the chloride route, whereas Cu 2 + /CuO-like species were evident for the sulphate route. The apparent optical bandgap decreased from 3.00 eV for pristine TiO 2 to 2.37 eV for N-TiO 2 and 2.45–2.57 eV for the Cu-containing materials. After 100 min of visible-light exposure, N-TiO 2 gave the highest endpoint methylene-blue decolorization (66.4%), compared with 55.9% for pristine TiO 2 . Against Staphylococcus aureus, N-TiO 2 and 6% Cu-TiO 2 produced descriptive reductions of 2.83 and 2.08 log10, respectively. These findings support further development of modified TiO 2 coatings, although charge-carrier dynamics, reactive oxygen species, coating durability, and nanoparticle leaching were not measured directly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayiya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: