Why the study?
Does ecological momentary assessment (EMA) provide different headache intensity ratings compared to recalled self-report in patients with tension-type headache?
Does ecological momentary assessment (EMA) provide different headache intensity ratings compared to recalled self-report in patients with tension-type headache?
Recalled headache intensity shows low agreement with momentary assessment, particularly in patients with highly variable headaches, suggesting recall bias.
Recalled headache intensity may misrepresent real-time pain in variable cases; leaves open whether EMA should supplant recall in assessment and trials.
Recalled evaluation of headache intensity is often affected by several factors. Recently, computerized ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has been developed to avoid such problems as recall bias. Here, we compared recalled headache intensity with momentary headache intensity using EMA in tension-type headache (TTH). Forty patients with TTH wore watch-type computers for 1 week to record momentary headache intensity and also rated their headache intensities by recall. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients between recalled headache intensity and indices from EMA recordings in the whole study population and in two subgroups divided by variability of momentary headache intensity. The results showed that consistency and agreement of momentary and recalled headache intensity were low, and this was especially marked in the subjects whose headache varied widely. These observations suggested that variability of headache intensity may affect recall of headache intensity and this should be taken into consideration in both clinical and research settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kikuchi et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: