Examines the impact of peri-urban development on residents’ quality of life in Timișoara, indicating the need for improved governance strategies.
This paper examines how residents and local actors in the peri-urban areas of Timișoara perceive the spatial change and the effects of rapid peri-urban development on their quality of life. To do this, we addressed three related dimensions: 1) the perceived advantages and disadvantages of everyday life in the two localities; 2) the ways in which respondents relate recent demographic and spatial changes to their quality of life; and 3) residents’ evaluations of local planning and public administration in managing peri-urban development. The study is based on data obtained from 34 semi-structured interviews conducted in two peri-urban settlements of Timișoara. The findings highlight that the peri-urban area of Timișoara should no longer be viewed merely as a transitional space between the city and the countryside, but as a distinct and increasingly influential territorial system. Furthermore, results also show that residents in peri-urban areas have an ambivalent view of residential appeal, demographic vitality and aspirations for an improved quality of life versus fragmented planning, infrastructure pressures, socio-spatial inequalities and uneven governance capacities. We conclude that without coordinated planning, peri-urban growth risks exacerbating existing dysfunctions. However, appropriate governance tools could make these territories become strategic spaces for sustainable metropolitan development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chasciar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: