Descriptive cross-sectional study assesses clinical empathy perceptions in interns, suggesting a training need.
Background: Clinical empathy enhances doctor-patient relationships and treatment outcomes, yet its development among medical interns remains underexplored. Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess interns’ perceptions and self-reported practices of clinical empathy in a medical college in Chennai. Material and Methods: A hospital-based, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from August to October 2020 among 117 interns (81.81% of 143) using the Student Version of the Jefferson scale of empathy (JSE-S). Data on demographics, empathy perceptions, and practices were collected through Google Forms after obtaining informed consent. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0. Descriptive statistics, t -tests, Chi-square tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze the effects of gender, age, specialty, and parental medical background. Results: Participants (mean age = 22.66, Standard deviation [SD] = 0.81) had a mean JSE-S score of 79.30 (SD = 14.07). Females (56.4%) scored higher than males (43.6%) in compassionate care (median 35 vs. 32, U = 1378, p = 0.04) and walking in patients’ shoes (median 9 vs. 7, U = 1132, p = 0.003), with empathy practice differing by gender (χ 2 = 7.6044, p = 0.022). Logistic regression identified JSE-S score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, p = 0.03) and surgical specialty (OR = 3.12, p = 0.04) as predictors of empathy, not gender or age ( p > 0.54). Death (40.36%) and cancer (36.69%) were primary empathy triggers. Conclusion: Interns exhibit moderate empathy, with gender and specialty influencing perceptions and practices. Lower scores suggest a need for empathy-focused training, such as Medical Humanities, to align with the National Medical Commission’s attitudes, communication, and ethics goals. Qualitative studies could further elucidate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annadurai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: