Qualitative analysis identifies a governance gap in health data frameworks, proposing a new co-regulatory approach to enhance accountability.
Wearable health data, generated continuously by consumer and medical wearables and their companion platforms, have become a critical object of public-sector information governance. Yet the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act remain poorly aligned with continuous, platform-mediated, and cross-border data flows. This article proposes Good Data Service Practice (GDSP) as a co-regulatory policy instrument that operates as an institutional overlay to statutory regulation. Drawing on policy-tools theory and the information-polity literature, the study conducts a qualitative comparative legal-framework analysis of the three jurisdictions and identifies a shared pattern of instrumental misalignment between strong legal authority and weak operational governance capacity. By reframing data sovereignty as governed interoperability, GDSP offers digital-government decision-makers a transferable instrument for operationalising accountability, trust, and public values in data-intensive environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: