Demonstrates uniform capacity–defect method for kissing numbers, suggesting a fundamental advancement in dimensional analysis.
We introduce a capacity–defect method for the kissing number problem that applies uniformly across dimensions. The framework consists of: (1) an exact Gegenbauer capacity identity converting the problem to a constrained triangle-free graph; (2) sharp d-ray energy caps c(d) = (d+1)(d+2)/(8d); (3) an odd–even corridor forcing antipodality at equality; (4) elementary local reconstruction of the optimal configuration. Only the Gegenbauer coefficients change between dimensions — the architecture is identical. Paper 1 demonstrates the method on K₄ = 24: the same formulas that Musin's 32-page modified LP argument required are here reduced to an 8-page self-contained proof of D₄ equality rigidity, infinitesimal jamming, and saturation. Paper 2 applies the identical framework to prove K₇ = 126, resolving a problem open since the Bachoc–Vallentin bound of 2008. The proof combines the capacity identity, exact finite sector certificates, a full-space compression to a single five-cycle Gram problem, and an exact PSD closure with rational contradiction gap 187/6720. The archive contains all computational certificates in exact integer/rational arithmetic. No floating-point comparison enters any theorem decision. 52C17 (Packing and covering in n dimensions)52C25 (Rigidity and flexibility of structures) 05C35 (Extremal problems in graph theory)68V20 (Formalization of mathematics in connection with theorem provers)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleksei Novgorodtsev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: