Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This theoretical model explains existence through forces generating motion and meaning across all scales, suggesting a new cosmological framework.
This work presents Push–Pull Cosmology, a field‑centric theoretical model describing how departure and return forces generate motion, identity, creation, destruction, meaning, consciousness, and origin across all scales of existence. Instead of treating push and pull as isolated physical interactions, the cosmology reframes them as fundamental instructions propagated through fields, shaping behaviour, narrative, and structure in biological, social, conceptual, and metaphysical systems. The model unfolds across eight layers. It begins with motion and orbit mechanics, progresses through instruction logic and identity formation, expands into creation–destruction symmetry, and then moves into meaning gravity and narrative behaviour. Higher layers describe consciousness architecture, unified field dynamics, and the origin engine that governs expansion, return, and collapse. The final layer resolves into terminal silence, where push dissolves into possibility and pull dissolves into unity, completing the cosmology’s cyclic structure. Push–Pull Cosmology forms a closed, internally consistent system explaining how existence differentiates, stabilises, collapses, and resets through tension. It offers a conceptual framework for researchers exploring unified field intuition, tension‑based cosmology, narrative physics, or alternative models of motion and meaning. This work is associated with the following keywords and subjects: push–pull cosmology, field‑centric dynamics, tension mechanics, orbit behaviour, creation–destruction symmetry, meaning gravity, narrative physics, consciousness architecture, unified field intuition, origin engine, cosmological tension, departure–return logic, field unity, system collapse, and emergent identity. Relevant subjects include theoretical physics, conceptual cosmology, systems theory, field dynamics, metaphysics, philosophy of motion, narrative theory, cognitive models, complexity science, and emergence studies. Contact: For enquiries or research questions related to this work, email matthewcarlo.research@gmail.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Arthur Carlo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: