Why the study?
Data on the effectiveness of resistance training with blood flow restriction from a health perspective remain limited.
Does low intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction increase acute inflammatory responses compared to low intensity resistance training alone in non-athletic male students?
Does low intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction increase acute inflammatory responses compared to low intensity resistance training alone in non-athletic male students?
Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction induces a similar acute inflammatory response to high-intensity resistance training, suggesting its potential utility in rehabilitation settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute inflammatory responses appear comparable across protocols; leaves open whether BFR alters risk in clinical rehabilitation.
Background: The effectiveness of resistance training (RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR) is limited from the health perspective. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the acute inflammatory response to a single bout of RT with or without BFR. Methods: Twenty-four non-athletic male students were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 8), including: (1) high intensity (HIRT- 80% of 1-RM: 3 × 10 R), (2) low intensity (40% of 1-RM: 3 × 30 R) with BFR (180 mmHg) (LIRT + BFR) and (3) LIRT. Results: Significant increase for IL1-β (p = 0.001), IL-6 (P = 0.001), TNF-α (P = 0.002), CRP (P = 0.007), ICAM1 (P = 0.016), HCY (P = 0.008) were observed. These responses in the HIRE and LIRT + BFR groups were significantly higher than in the LIRT group respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: The LIRT + BFR has similar effects to HIRT and can be used in rehabilitation training. The gradual overload and proper recovery are very important due to the increase in acute inflammatory responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asadi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: