Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, four approximate cone-beam CT reconstruction algorithms are compared: Advanced single slice rebinning (ASSR) as a representative of algorithms employing a two dimensional approximation, PI, PI-SLANT, and 3-PI which all use a proper three dimensional back-projection. A detailed analysis of the image artifacts produced by these techniques shows that aliasing in the z-direction is the predominant source of artifacts for a 16-row scanner with 1.25 mm nominal slice thickness. For a detector with isotropic resolution of 0.5 mm, we found that ASSR and PI produce different kinds of artifacts which are almost at the same level, while PI-SLANT produces none of these artifacts. It is shown that the use of redundant data in the 3-PI method suppresses aliasing artifacts efficiently for both scanners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köhler et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: