Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, the authors report on the level of information exchange between consultants and the public in 12 Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIA) in Malawi. Six of the underlying projects are located in urban areas, while six are located in rural areas. We find that in all cases there is a prioritization of perceived positive economic outcomes over likely negative environmental and social impacts. Vested interests of consultants and developers as well as unrealistic expectations of local communities regarding desired economic benefits of development projects, paired with prevailing poverty levels, are key factors contributing to this outcome. In this context, we also found that most of the concerns of communities were subordinated to assumed economic benefits. This is particularly prevalent in rural areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sibale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: