Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The goal of this work was to investigate magnetization transfer (MT) in cartilage by measuring water proton signals Ms/Mo, as an indicator of MT, in (i) single-component systems of the tissue's constituent macromolecules and (ii) intact cartilage under control conditions and after two pathomimetic interventions. Ms/Mo was quantified with a 12-microT saturation pulse applied 6 kHz off resonance. Both glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and collagen exhibited concentration dependent effects on Ms/Mo, being approximately linear for GAG solutions (Ms/Mo = -0.0137[% GAG] + 1.02) and exponential for collagen suspensions (Ms/Mo = 0.80 x exp[-(%collagen)/6.66] + 0.20); the direct saturation of water could not account for the measured Ms/Mo. Although the effect of collagen on Ms/Mo is much stronger than for a corresponding concentration of GAG, Ms/Mo is not very sensitive to changes in collagen concentration in the physiological range. Tissue degradation with 25 mg/ml trypsin led to an increase in Ms/Mo from the baseline value of 0.2 (final/initial values = 1.15 +/- 0.13, n = 11, P < 0.001). In contrast, a 10-day treatment of cartilage with 100 ng/ml of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) caused a 19% decrease in Ms/Mo (final/initial values = 0.81 +/- 0.08, n = 3, P = 0.085). The changes in hydration and macromolecular content for the two treatments were comparable, suggesting that Ms/Mo is sensitive to macromolecular structure as well as concentration. In conclusion, whereas the baseline Ms/Mo value in cartilage may be primarily due to the tissue collagen concentration, changes in Ms/Mo may be due to physiological or pathophysiological changes in GAG concentration and tissue structure, and the measured Ms/Mo may differentiate between various pathomimetic degradative procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gray et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: