BACKGROUND: Since the release of protease inhibitors, only 2 randomized trials in the late 1990s have re-assessed the potency of dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combination (2N) as a maintenance strategy for patients whose HIV RNA was suppressed by tri-therapy. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients who exhibited durable virologic suppression while receiving 2N. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 2 French hospitals. Using electronic medical records, we identified all HIV-1-infected patients treated with tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine (without a third agent) between 2005 and 2012. RESULTS: Out of 1,255 patients, 37 (3%) received a 2N regimen and were included in this study. All received a fixed-dose combination of either tenofovir/emtricitabine (n = 31) or abacavir/lamivudine (n = 6). This regimen was a first-line (n = 8) or a simplification (n = 29) strategy. The total follow-up for patients receiving 2N was 123 patient-years (median, 3.2 years; interquartile range [IQR], 1.3-5.1). At the last visit, 33 of 37 patients were continuing with 2N and had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (success rate of 89%, snapshot analysis). These patients had received early treatment (median CD4+ nadir, 340/mm3) and had a low HIV RNA zenith (median, 3.9 log/mL) and a low HIV DNA level (median, 2.5 log copies/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells). Four patients, treated with tenofovir/emtricitabine in the simplify cation group, experienced viral failure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, in selected patients, a 2N fixed-dose combination is able to maintain viral suppression durably. Such a simple strategy could reduce both the constraints and side effects experienced by patients and the costs for the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prazuck et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: