Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The idea that patients should be informed about the benefits and risks of treatment options and involved in decisions about their care is, to many people, appealing and sensible. However, it has important implications. This paper briefly considers two motivations for involving patients in clinical decisions and explores some of the issues raised by these. It then makes some practical suggestions for those wanting to provide information to support patient involvement. The paper emphasizes that although the provision of more good‐quality information to patients is widely accepted to be a priority, it is not always a straightforward matter and warrants critical consideration. Substantial resources may be needed if it is to be done well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Entwistle et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: