Why the study?
Does head impact exposure in practices correlate with exposure in games for youth football players?
Does head impact exposure in practices correlate with exposure in games for youth football players?
Head impact exposure frequency and magnitude during youth football practices strongly correlate with those experienced during games, providing a baseline for injury reduction efforts.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Youth players face high head impact exposure; leaves open optimal mitigation in practices versus games.
This study aimed to compare head impact exposures between practices and games in football players ages 9 to 14 years, who account for approximately 70% of all football players in the United States. Over a period of 2 seasons, 136 players were enrolled from 3 youth programs, and 49,847 head impacts were recorded from 345 practices and 137 games. During the study, individual players sustained a median of 211 impacts per season, with a maximum of 1226 impacts. Players sustained 50th (95th) percentile peak linear acceleration of 18.3 (46.9) g, peak rotational acceleration of 1305.4 (3316.6) rad·s −2 , and Head Impact Technology Severity Profile of 13.7 (24.3), respectively. Overall, players with a higher frequency of head impacts at practices recorded a higher frequency of head impacts at games ( P < .001, r 2 = .52), and players who sustained a greater average magnitude of head impacts during practice also recorded a greater average magnitude of head impacts during games ( P < .001). The youth football head impact data quantified in this study provide valuable insight into the player exposure profile, which should serve as a key baseline in efforts to reduce injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellamkonda et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: