Consumer‐run warm lines are typified by a dilemmatic ideology, consisting of contrary themes, that leads to working consumers putting forth advice in implicit ways. Using conversation analysis, I describe features of 3 methods working consumers used to put forth options for clients to act upon: incorporating a solution within a query; sharing one's own problems and solutions; and merely giving information about a solution. These methods tied to contrary themes by fitting the form [speaker appears to be doing X while also doing Y], where X and Y related to contrary themes. By carefully combining a relevant theory with conversation analysis, this study further illustrates the complexity and situated nature of advice‐giving, and connects interactional features with organizational goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Pudlinski (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: