Why the study?
Although TAPSE/PASP ratio is prognostic in HFrEF, its significance in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy needed evaluation.
Does the TAPSE/PASP ratio predict CRT response and clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF undergoing CRT?
Does the TAPSE/PASP ratio predict CRT response and clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF undergoing CRT?
The TAPSE/PASP ratio is a useful echocardiographic marker for predicting CRT response and long-term adverse cardiovascular events in patients with HFrEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RV-PA coupling may refine pre-CRT risk stratification in HFrEF; leaves open prospective validation before guiding selection.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular - arterial (RV-PA) coupling can be estimated by echocardiography using the ratio between (TAPSE) and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP). TAPSE/PASP ratio proved to be a prognostic parameter in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of RV-PA coupling in patients with HFrEF undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: Patients undergoing CRT in our center between January 2017 and November 2019 were eligible. Response to CRT was defined by a reduction of more than 15% of left ventricle systolic volume (LVESV) one year after CRT. Primary endpoint was a composite of HF hospitalizations and death during follow-up. RESULTS: 54 patients (Age 64.0 ± 13.8 years; 58% male; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 28.4 ± 1.3%) were prospectively included. After a mean follow-up of 31 ± 12.9months, the primary endpoint had occurred in 18 (33.3%) patients. A lower TAPSE/PASP ratio was associated with baseline worse HF symptoms, lower LVEF and long-term less LV reverse remodeling (P < .05). After one year CRT improved RV systolic function (TAPSE, RV global longitudinal strain, P < .05), but not TAPSE/PASP ratio (P = .4). The ratio TAPSE/PASP (AUC=0.834) ≥ 0.58 mm/mm Hg showed good sensitivity (90%) and specificity (81.8%) for predicting response to CRT while a ratio <0.58 mm/mm Hg was associated with a higher risk of death and HF hospitalizations during the follow-up (HR 5.37 95%CI [1.6-18], P < .001). CONCLUSION: RV-PA coupling evaluation using TAPSE/PASP ratio predicts CRT response. A lower TAPSE/PASP ratio is associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deaconu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: