Why the study?
Resistant hypertension carries an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but data on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are scarce.
Do elevated systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure on ABPM predict future cardiovascular events in patients with true resistant hypertension?
Do elevated systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure on ABPM predict future cardiovascular events in patients with true resistant hypertension?
In patients with true resistant hypertension, elevated 24-hour ABPM parameters, particularly pulse pressure > 60 mm Hg, are independent predictors of future cardiovascular events.
ABPM parameters may aid risk stratification in resistant hypertension; leaves open whether they should guide management.
Given the increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with resistant hypertension, predictive cardiovascular prognosis is extremely important. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is mandatory for resistant hypertension diagnosis, but its use for prognosis is scarce. This observational longitudinal study included 258 patients (mean age of 60.4 ± 11.2 years; 61.2% male), who underwent 24 h ABPM in a hypertension unit from 1999 to 2019. The outcomes were global cardiovascular events (cerebrovascular, coronary, and other cardiovascular events). The mean follow-up period was 6.0 ± 5.0 years. Sixty-eight cardiovascular events (61 nonfatal) were recorded. Patients who experienced cardiovascular events were generally older, with higher rates of chronic kidney disease and prior cardiovascular events. The 24 h systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio 1.44; 95% CI 1.10-1.88), night systolic blood pressure (1.35; 95% CI 1.01-1.80), and 24 h pulse pressure (2.07; 95% CI 1.17-3.67) were independent predictors of global cardiovascular events. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed a higher risk of future cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with a 24 h daytime and nighttime pulse pressure > 60 mm Hg with respective hazard ratios of 1.95; 95% CI 1.01-3.45; 2.15; 95% CI 1.21-3.83 and 2.07; 95% CI 1.17-3.67. In conclusion, APBM is a fundamental tool not only for the diagnosis of resistant hypertension, but also for predicting future cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bastos et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: