Why the study?
Does continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis improve symptoms, reduce hospitalizations, and increase ejection fraction in patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease?
Does continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis improve symptoms, reduce hospitalizations, and increase ejection fraction in patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease?
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis significantly reduces hospitalizations, improves ejection fraction, and relieves symptoms in patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease.
May reduce hospitalizations in severe HF-CKD; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Over a period of 6.5 years, we treated 19 patients, all of whom suffered from severe heart failure and various stages of chronic kidney disease, excluding those with end-stage kidney failure. Before peritoneal catheter implantation, all patients had ascites, dyspnea, orthopnea, and an ejection fraction ranging from 20 to 45%. Seven of them (7/19) were able to take care of themselves, 9/19 needed assistance for their daily activities, and the remaining 3 were bedridden. All of them needed hospitalization 1 - 3 times/month during the year before the initiation of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). With peritoneal dialysis, daily ultrafiltrate volume ranged from 500 to 3,000 ml and, after an average of 2 months of peritoneal dialysis, body weight decreased significantly (74.7 ± 13 vs. 69.7 ± 10.2, p = 0.02). At the same time, diuresis improved significantly, and this allowed a reduction in the dose of diuretics. Dyspnea and orthopnea improved significantly in all patients. The patients' degree of self-care and ability to sleep lying flat improved significantly as the need for hospitalization declined. Before peritoneal dialysis, patients were hospitalized for 5 - 20 days/month for pulmonary edema or overhydration, whereas with peritoneal dialysis, nobody was hospitalized for these causes (chi2, p = 0.0001). Ejection fraction also improved in all of them (28.6 ± 8.6 vs. 36.8 ± 12.5%, p = 0.0001). Actual survival of our patients ranged from 6 to 86 months (mean ± SD = 24.6 ± 20.8). Actuarial survival was 68% at 1 year and 42% at 2 years. During peritoneal dialysis we observed only two episodes of peritonitis. Four patients developed a severe episode of hypotension during implantation of the catheters from the sudden removal of 4 - 6 l of ascitic fluid. We conclude that peritoneal dialysis is a good method for the treatment of congestive heart failure because it increases the quality of life and life expectancy in patients with poor prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sotirakopoulos et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: