Why the study?
Does higher volume high-intensity intermittent exercise (2.5 km) increase autonomic stress during recovery compared to lower volume (1.25 km) in physically active subjects?
Does higher volume high-intensity intermittent exercise (2.5 km) increase autonomic stress during recovery compared to lower volume (1.25 km) in physically active subjects?
Higher volume high-intensity intermittent exercise induces greater autonomic stress during recovery, suggesting that lower volume exercise may be preferable to minimize autonomic loading while promoting physical fitness.
HRV recovery after differing HIIE volumes remains preliminary; leaves open optimal dosing for autonomic restoration.
The aim of this study was to compare heart rate variability (HRV) recovery after 2 sessions of high-intensity intermittent exercise at different volumes (1.25 km [HIIE1.25] and 2.5 km [HIIE2.5]). 13 participants determined their maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and completed 2 HIIE (1:1 at 100% MAS) trials. The heart rate was recorded before and after each session. HRV indicators were calculated according to time (RMSSD and SDNN) and frequency (LF, HF and LF/HF ratio) domains. SDNN and RMSSD presented effect of test (F=20.97; p<0.01 and F=21.00; p<0.01, respectively) and moment (F=6.76; p<0.01 and F=12.30; p<0.01, respectively), without interaction. Even though we did not find an interaction effect for any HRV variables, the HIIE2.5 presented a delay of only 5 min in HRV recovery, when compared to HIIE1.25. However, the effects of the test (SDNN, RMSSD, LF-log, and HF-log) indicate higher autonomic stress during the entire recovery period. These findings may indicate that exercise volume interferes with HRV recovery. If so, physically active subjects may choose a lower volume exercise (i. e., HIIE1.25) in order to promote similar physical fitness adaptations with lower loading on autonomic modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castrillón et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: